White v Ideal Concreting and Landscapes ABN 75 165 352 250 [2022] QCAT 310

Item

Title
White v Ideal Concreting and Landscapes ABN 75 165 352 250 [2022] QCAT 310
Date
August 22, 2022
Decision Maker
HRA Sections
Rights Considered
Keywords
Summary
The case concerned, inter alia, an application to amend a default decision to add another party. One relevant consideration was prejudice against the party to be added.

The Tribunal noted that the right to a fair hearing is fundamental to any administration of justice according to law in the State of Queensland, including at the Tribunal: at [36].

Prior orders of the Tribunal notwithstanding, it had not been proven to the applicable standard that anything relevant has come to specific attention of the party to be added, with the Tribunal noting that ex parte applications have significantly higher duties on the applicant regarding evidence and submissions both for and against the making of the decision, and of which very little had been seen to be discharged: at [37].

Similar concerns had been expressed in comparable circumstances by the Tribunal on multiple occasions both before and after the passing of the Human Rights Act 2019: at [38]. The application was found to fundamentally flawed on multiple grounds and dismissed: at [49].
Item sets
MassImport