Smith v State of Queensland (Queensland Health) & Anor [2022] QIRC 462
Item
-
Title
-
Smith v State of Queensland (Queensland Health) & Anor [2022] QIRC 462
-
Date
-
November 28, 2022
-
Summary
-
The case concerned an application for leave to be legally represented. The court considered that the applicant’s right to equal protection would not be compromised, and granted leave.
The case concerned an application for leave to be legally represented in proceedings concerning a general protections application pursuant to ch 8 pt 1 div 3 of the Industrial Relations Act 2016 (Qld).
The applicant submitted, inter alia, that ‘a factor to be considered is whether it is fair for the Applicant to 'face an unequal opponent' when he has a right to equal protection against discrimination under s 15(4) of the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld)’: at [21].
However, the Court considered that the applicant’s right to equal protection would not be compromised by allowing the respondents legal representation, referring to Neate IC in Wanninayake v State of Queensland (Department of Natural Resources and Mines) [2014] QIRC 079 who considered that ‘competent legal representation….can assist in ensuring that the proceedings remain focused on the real issues of fact and law, that the distinction between evidence and submissions is observed, that evidence is properly adduced….and that submissions are confined to the matters which the Commission must decide’: at [34].
Leave was granted for the respondents to be legally represented in the proceedings.
