CTR [2022] QCAT 368

Item

Title
CTR [2022] QCAT 368
Date
October 26, 2022
Decision Maker
HRA Sections
Summary
This case involved the appointment of the Public Guardian and the Public Trustee as guardian and administrator for CTR, where there were numerous claims for guardianship and administrator by CTR’s son, CTR’s friend and a parish priest. The Tribunal was satisfied that the medical evidence indicated that CTR’s diagnosis of dementia impaired his capacity to make decisions with respect to personal and financial matters.

Member Casey considered that the Tribunal was subject to the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) and that any limitation placed on CTR’s human rights, such as CTR’s right to privacy, freedom of movement, and property rights may be engaged and limited by decision of the Tribunal to appoint a guardian and administrator. The relevant rights under the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) were freedom of movement (section 19), property rights (section 24) and right to privacy and reputation (section 25).

In consideration of the evidence provided by all parties for CTR, Member Casey acknowledged that CTR’s son and CTR’s friend would not be able to effectively consult with relevant stakeholders in order to discharge appropriate decision making. Accordingly, the Public Guardian and Public Trustee were appointed pursuant to a reviewable two-year term. In making this order, Member Casey accepted that the decision was ‘the least restrictive option given the adult’s vulnerability, and that the benefits … outweigh any limitations imposed on the adult’s human rights’: at [74].
Visit the judgement
CTR [2022] QCAT 368
Item sets
MassImport